Face2face Contact ltd Served Notice of High Treason

Notice High Treason

Thomas David Mark Jones Williams born March 1962
a man sometimes acts as the CEO of a service corporation
John Easden born June 1963
a man sometimes acts as the CEO of a service corporation
Face2face ltd a service corporation (not a bailiff’s)
16 Shottery brook office park
Timothy bridge road
CV37 9NR
company number 5849491

Notice to principal is notice to agent; notice to agent is notice to principal;

27th September 2022

Greetings Thomas, John,

This is a Notice for High Treason and the Disc enclosed Shoe Horned into the EU should be viewed read and understood and to continue when High Treason is evidenced will only mean one thing and that is everyone working for this repugnant service corporation known as the Face2face contact ltd are complicit. Following orders didn’t go down well the last time it was used as a pathetic excuse see the Nuremberg trials we the people have had enough of this corruption, Treason and High Treason being committed by corrupt service corporations namely Face2face.

It is no good thinking all can hide behind a corrupt legal system of slavery using the colour of law to deceive living man and woman, ignorance of the Law is no excuse. Now it has been brought to your attention and should you fail and ignore this Notice of High Treason it will be taken as Thomas and John are complicit and a claim for harassment will be filed in a court of record without any further notice being given also Thomas and John are now going to be added to the perfected commercial lien as debtors and the standard commercial penalty of three plus one will apply and will be uploaded to the UCC, Uniform Commercial Code.

This is Thomas and John’s last and final warning to cease and desist IMMEDIATELY the implied rights of access is irrevocably been removed to the above private property for any agent acting through the repugnant service corporation known as Face2face contact ltd not a bailiff’s a support service and this communication will also be forwarded to the police for harassment.

Face2face contact ltd are not even bailiff’s nothing but a support service and therefore committing crimes against we the people this is also Treason. We the people own the national grid that were paid for by we the people not service corporations and was sold by Thatcher without consent of the people no energy company provides the gas or electric

As per the enclosed evidence Act of Settlement 1700 and the Journals of the houses of commons page 663 and 664 the true powers is with the people and the birthrights of the people not service corporations just like McDonald’s and simply continuing to diminish i rights by using fraudulent syntax grammar to deliberately to try and deceive i is not acceptable and is against the law Falsa orthographia, sive falsa grammatica, non vitiate concessionem. Neither faulty spelling nor faulty grammar will vitiate a grant or a wish. Neither false Latin nor false English will make a deed void when the intent of the parties plainly appears as per the Plain Language Movement and the Golden Rule. This includes altering my private property into a corporation and will also be used as evidence against all involved in this Treason namely Thomas and John. Anyone writing to a dead entity is not of sound mind diminishing my god given rights into a legal fiction dead entity to try to gain joinder is absolutely pathetic, childish and immature beyond belief and harassment. FCO 30/1048 on the enclosed Disc Treason and to continue will be taken as being complicit.

i also draw Thomas and John’s attention to R v Robert White Ref 46XY1094519 Trespass.

The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

This is referring to the the use of all capitalize letters and use of the legal fiction name in all capitols and in bold which is not English which has been kept unopened as it is against the Law to open someone else’s mail and will be used as evidence against both Thomas and John in their personal and private unlimited capacities, Thomas and John are using fraudulent syntax grammar and proof of the following 4 simple questions need rebutting with substance.

  1. Who claimed i property?
  2. Who can administer property without rights?
  3. Produce the verified claim or contract that Thomas and John are relying on to have jurisdiction over i without consent.
  4. Produce the obligation (contract) that Thomas and John rely upon to have jurisdiction over i.

Failure to answer yes to the above questions and produced the verified evidence then no man or woman or any man or woman acting through the repugnant service corporation known as Face2face (2faced) contact ltd has jurisdiction over i or i private property period. Also the Castle doctrine.

Thomas and John need to verify and prove the alleged debt is true, that i owe Thomas and John and/or Scottish power (deed of assignment) and the alleged debt is now due and addressed in the correct sentence structure communication parse syntax grammar ie in plain English not Japanese, Chinese or legalese.

Fined annexed to this Notice of High Treason the following:

  1. Act of settlement 1700.
  2. Treason Act 1795
  3. Journals of the Houses of Commons page 663 and 664.
  4. Theft Act 1968 section 5
  5. Clearfield Doctrine
  6. Trespass Notice
  7. Face2face contact ltd not a bailiff but a support service
  8. Motu Proprio
  9. Void Order
  10. Bill of Rights 1689
  11. Coronation Oath Act 1688
  12. 12 Presumptions of Law
  13. Habeas Corpus 1679
  14. Rights of Entry (Gas and Electricity Boards) Act 1954
  15. Fee schedule for further communication and Trespass on private property.
  16. Disc called Shoe horned into the EU….TREASON. Shoe Horned into the EU Zip file

i also draw Thomas and John’s attention to Archbold Criminal Pleading Evidence and Practice 2006 section 1-6 Disobedience of Statutes “Where a statute has declared any act or omission to be Treason, felony, misprision of Treason” and don’t think for a minute that a corrupt government can repeal the Treason act when it is not a Regall government it can not the Treason Act is still as it is and the penalty is DEATH. Also see Coronation Oath Act

Lord Denning, famously said the following:
“A void order is incurably void, and all proceedings based on the invalid claim or void act
are also void. Even a decision of the higher courts (High Court, Court of Appeal and
Supreme Court) will be void if the decision is founded on an invalid claim or void act,
because something cannot be founded on nothing.” (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United
Africa Co. Ltd. [1961]. Where is the Warrant signed by a Judge with wet ink signature and court seal.

i are writing to inform you that i have removed your Implied Right of Access to the above private property.
If i find that you, or any other representative of the companies named above, have entered onto this private property without our prior written permission, you will have committed a criminal offence of Aggravated Trespass and i can take your statement under caution in accordance with Sections 68 and 69 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.

i are taking this step because:
Your Corporation (NOT EVEN A BAILIFF) appears to be operating under the misapprehension that a Magistrate Court Warrant exists and that in some-way confers the power of the Court to your Corporation (a support service). If such a court order exists, you will have no problem supplying a copy of the order to myself as per Civil Procedure Rules 40.4 (1) (b). Failure to provide a copy of the Magistrates Court signed and sealed Order, clearly identifying the Magistrate who issued the order, will confirm that no such order exists and you are in fact acting unlawfully in claiming you are acting under such authority.

Your company is acting unlawfully in attempting to “levy distress” for your client. The Tribunal Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 makes not mention of private companies acting as enforcement agent, leaving your company unrecognised as an entity in enforcement law and unregulated. CF the Magistrates Court Act 1980 Section 125B only allows authorised companies to “execute warrants”. If you have such a warrant, you can execute it by sending it via Royal Mail as other court documents are executed. No such communication has ever been received. Section 4 of the Magistrates Court Act 1980 states “(4)Where a warrant has been executed by a person mentioned in subsection (1) above, a written statement indicating the matters specified in subsection (5) below shall, on the demand of the person arrested, committed or detained or [in the case of a warrant of control, against whom the warrant is issued] , be shown to him as soon as practicable. “. I formally demand that the warrant be shown to me immediately. I require a written paper copy with Judge’s signature and Court seal be presented before any enforcement action is taken. Under Section 2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, it is a criminal offence of harassment to make demands for money in such a manner that it causes alarm, distress or intimidation. This is the case no matter what method you use to make contact – whether by telephone, email, letter or in person. Punishment on conviction is six months imprisonment and/or a level 5 fine of up to £5,000, plus legal costs.

Under section 1 of the Rights of Entry (Gas and Electricity Board) Act 1954, Restriction on exercise of rights of entry.
(1) No right of entry to which this Act applies shall be exercisable in respect of any
premises except—
(a) with consent given by or on behalf of the occupier of the premises, or
(b) under the authority of a warrant granted under the next following section:
Provided that this subsection shall not apply where entry is required in a case of emergency.

No Judge will issue a warrant of entry to fit pre-pay meters for a monitory issue and no consent will ever be granted.

The removal of your Implied Right of Access is the first step in our action to seek prosecution. Please be aware that should you or any other representative of your company set foot on the above property at any time, your statement can be used as evidence, along with any video and audio evidence obtained.

Aggravated Trespass is a summary offence that is heard in the magistrate’s courts and carries a maximum sentence of six months imprisonment. A charge of conspiracy to commit aggravated trespass also carries a maximum six-month sentence, but it is an indictable offence, which means the case will be heard in front of a jury in the crown courts. i take this offence extremely seriously and have successfully prosecuted others for this same offence in the past.

Now on to the fraudulent mail being sent by your repugnant service corporation a support service not a bailiff.

Frivolous, unsigned, unsealed letters do not comply with the Companies Act 2006 Section 44 & 45.
A PO Box is a non-contracting venue as it is not land-bound to anything. This means Face2face contact ltd are in the act of committing fraud under the Fraud Act 2006, Sections 2 (1) False Representation and Section 11, obtaining services dishonestly.

Franked mail is usually in direct violation of the Universal Postal Union Convention 1929, under Article 9 Violations, sections 2.1.2 prepayment impressions, 2.1.3 impressions of franking machines or printing presses and 2.2 concerning means of postal prepayment with the intention of obtaining illegitimate gain for oneself or for a third party.

Companies Act 2006
UK Public General Acts2006 c. 46 Part 4 Formalities of doing business…Section 44

44Execution of documents
(1)Under the law of England and Wales or Northern Ireland a document is executed by a company
(a)by the affixing of its common seal, or
(b)by signature in accordance with the following provisions.
(2)A document is validly executed by a company if it is signed on behalf of the company—
(a)by two authorised signatories, or
(b)by a director of the company in the presence of a witness who attests the signature.
(3)The following are “authorised signatories” for the purposes of subsection (2)—
(a)every director of the company, and
(b)in the case of a private company with a secretary or a public company, the secretary (or any joint secretary) of the company.
(4)A document signed in accordance with subsection (2) and expressed, in whatever words, to be executed by the company has the same effect as if executed under the common seal of the company.
(5)In favour of a purchaser a document is deemed to have been duly executed by a company if it purports to be signed in accordance with subsection (2).A “purchaser” means a purchaser in good faith for valuable consideration and includes a lessee, mortgagee or other person who for valuable consideration acquires an interest in property.
(6)Where a document is to be signed by a person on behalf of more than one company, it is not duly signed by that person for the purposes of this section unless he signs it separately in each capacity.
(7)References in this section to a document being (or purporting to be) signed by a director or secretary are to be read, in a case where that office is held by a firm, as references to its being (or purporting to be) signed by an individual authorised by the firm to sign on its behalf.
(8)This section applies to a document that is (or purports to be) executed by a company in the name of or on behalf of another person whether or not that person is also a company.

Companies Act 2006
UK Public General Acts2006 c. 46 Part 4 Formalities of doing business…Section 45

45Common seal
(1)A company may have a common seal, but need not have one.
(2)A company which has a common seal shall have its name engraved in legible characters on the seal.
(3)If a company fails to comply with subsection (2) an offence is committed by—
(a)the company, and
(b)every officer of the company who is in default.
(4)An officer of a company, or a person acting on behalf of a company, commits an offence if he uses, or authorises the use of, a seal purporting to be a seal of the company on which its name is not engraved as required by subsection (2).
(5)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
(6)This section does not form part of the law of Scotland.

It is also against the Law to send windowed envelopes in commerce ignorance of the Law is no excuse.

i strongly advise that Thomas and John act now to stop representatives of your company from entering onto the above private property, as failure to do so may result in a criminal prosecution against Thomas and John and your company and the individuals involved. You can avoid this easily by returning this matter back to the Court, if such a Court case ever existed or to Scottish power, and kindly informing your staff that they will be subject to criminal prosecution if they intrude onto the above private property. Also to never try and communicate to the above private property ever again either by postal mail or by Trespassing on my private property.

All words herein as i define them as defined in the Oxford dictionary of English.

All Rights Reserved, i reserve all rights

V.C. :Steven. Born into the Kirk Family.